Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory16.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateOct 18 '21 at 21:05
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 224
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 488
51% 411 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.9% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 113
Parallax 102
82% 105 fps
MRender 94.2
Gravity 102
Splatting 102
82% 99.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 983
Write 784
Mixed 506
168% 758 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 35
135% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 426
DQ Write 403
DQ Mixed 389
299% 406 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 133%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 30 31 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 99.5
Write 26.7
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 30
35% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$50
426GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 128 128 126 127 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 104
SusWrite 126
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$50
462GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 91 89 91 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 65.9
Write 62.9
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 90.1
54% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.2% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 22.6
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 17.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback