Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 20 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '22 at 07:52
Run Duration677 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$750
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 101
60% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 73.8
13% 87.9 Pts
64-Core 63.9
4% 63.9 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$540
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
2.17% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 22.6
Parallax 12.1
0% 11.8 fps
MRender 20.1
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 10.5
4% 11 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 2.17%
Great: 117%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Pc300 NVMe SK hynix 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20005A00 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 233 215 238 243 268 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 692
Write 319
Mixed 424
SusWrite 242
93% 419 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 26.5
105% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 482
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 358
276% 381 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 141%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$71
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 109 119 122 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 93.9
Write 73.2
Mixed 33
SusWrite 121
58% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
33.7% Below average
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 7.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 8.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 3 1 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 2,592 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $1,263
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $289Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-12400F $184Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11600K $250Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback