Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 86% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	99.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170620
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '22 at 14:47
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 68.3 1-Core 110 2-Core 220 73% 133 Pts	4-Core 436 8-Core 682 69% 559 Pts	64-Core 840 52% 840 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3602) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 165 Reflection 185 Parallax 181 134% 177 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 184 Splatting 124 119% 147 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 280 151 141 159 153 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	99.8% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 475 Mixed 377 SusWrite 214 87% 389 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 79 4K Mixed 49.7 163% 55.6 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 350 266% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 134%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 795GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 126 Write 42.7 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 26.4 40% 55 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.1 47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 72%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 84 100 99 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Read 96.9 Write 94.6 Mixed 50.9 SusWrite 96.3 62% 84.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 104%
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 8TB 824 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 5TB free Firmware: SN04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 220 214 221 223 223 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 68% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 160 164 175 168 165 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	76.3% Very good	Read 100 Write 122 Mixed 64.1 SusWrite 164 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.6 205% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 90%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4TB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 187 159 185 188 192 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB 2,707 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.8% Very good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 25.1 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 22.7 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)