Jginyue X79M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Jginyue X79M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210311
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '22 at 12:29
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2651 v2 80 User benchmarks, average bench 56% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Memory 71 1-Core 52.7 2-Core 107 48% 76.8 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 426 38% 319 Pts	64-Core 806 50% 806 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 3693) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	6.84% Terrible	Lighting 8.5 Reflection 8.9 Parallax 9.4 7% 8.93 fps	MRender 10.5 Gravity 7.4 Splatting 7.1 7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.84% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,716 Write 1,008 Mixed 520 237% 1,081 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 62.2 4K Mixed 42.3 145% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 315 DQ Write 222 DQ Mixed 261 197% 266 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 117GB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 73 75 73 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 68.3 Write 70.5 Mixed 45.8 SusWrite 73.2 47% 64.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1GB free Firmware: 0A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 98 Write 100 Mixed 89.7 72% 96 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GR7AFR8C 4x8GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.7% Average	MC Read 22.9 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 18.3 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 6.6 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 99.1 40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79M-PLUS Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Jginyue X79M-PLUS

CPU
Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples	15x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	15x
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	13x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	10x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	8x

SSD
T253A3512G 512GBTeamBench 79%, 575 samples	6x
CS900 1TB SSDPNYBench 78%, 7,281 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	6x
36JSF1G72PZ-1 1x8GBMicronBench 30%, 33 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $200

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16