| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Powerspec PowerSpec (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASRock H110M-HDV |
| Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161024 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 14 '22 at 01:25 |
| Run Duration | 204 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73%
Very good
|
67% 113 Pts
|
50% 374 Pts
|
23% 374 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28%
Poor
|
29% 38.6 fps
|
27% 33.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 70 87 90 100 MB/s
|
51.1%
Above average
|
48% 65.5 MB/s
|
123% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GKE400UD51208-2400AH 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
66.9%
Good
|
68% 23.9 GB/s
|
56% 19.4 GB/s
|
52% 77.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PowerSpec Builds (Compare 359 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Powerspec PowerSpec
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 174x |
| Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 113x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 27x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 113x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 47x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 46x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 106% - Outstanding | Total price: $408 |