Asus Zephyrus G GU502DU_GA502DU

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus Zephyrus G GU502DU_GA502DU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GU502DU
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210310
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '22 at 01:49
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Memory 55.1 1-Core 86.5 2-Core 187 59% 110 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 562 51% 429 Pts	64-Core 547 34% 547 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18D1) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Lighting 19.4 Reflection 87 Parallax 25.9 16% 44.1 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 21.6 Splatting 14.3 13% 15.7 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,165 Write 895 Mixed 650 200% 903 MB/s	4K Read 49.7 4K Write 16.2 4K Mixed 18.4 108% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 334 DQ Write 13.8 DQ Mixed 26.9 56% 125 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 209%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 279GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 970 1051 878 798 758 810 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	206% Outstanding	Read 1239 Write 898 Mixed 999 SusWrite 877 225% 1,003 MB/s	4K Read 58.4 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 69.1 232% 76.9 MB/s	DQ Read 785 DQ Write 607 DQ Mixed 701 523% 698 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 206% Great: 355%
VendorCo ProductCode 8GB 4,860 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 15 15 14 15 14 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	7.13% Terrible	Read 22.9 Write 12.7 Mixed 7.2 SusWrite 14 17% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.13% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB 5,735 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.9% Good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 26 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 11.2 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Zephyrus G GU502DU_GA502DU Builds (Compare 598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Asus Zephyrus G GU502DU_GA502DU

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	598x

GPU
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	342x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 57%, 12,899 samples	255x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	1x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	333x
RBUSNS8154P3512GJ3 512GBKingstonBench 117%, 2,163 samples	122x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GBWDCBench 188%, 12,375 samples	17x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GBMicronBench 74%, 5,735 samples	367x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 38,499 samples	43x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 16GBMicronBench 71%, 379 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16