Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive313% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191024
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '22 at 19:38
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 294
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 1148
101% 859 Pts
64-Core 1,119
69% 1,119 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Lighting 47.2
Reflection 48.2
Parallax 42.8
38% 46.1 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 43.4
Splatting 37.6
32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
588GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1217 1268 1249 1227 1255 1243 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2,460
Write 2,283
Mixed 1,530
SusWrite 1,243
421% 1,879 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 80.8
267% 92.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,429
DQ Write 1,070
DQ Mixed 1,222
921% 1,241 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 313%
Great: 410%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
98GB free
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 184 192 172 183 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 459
Write 189
Mixed 218
SusWrite 178
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 14.7
104% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 28.3
49% 96.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 72%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
793GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 483 479 483 482 483 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 484
Mixed 438
SusWrite 482
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 56.6
186% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 355
266% 354 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 108 116 119 111 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
48% Average
Read 56.3
Write 72.3
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 111
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
43% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48%
Great: 90%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 156 153 158 158 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 121
Write 136
Mixed 120
SusWrite 155
99% 133 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.7
288% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 94%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 156 160 163 165 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 146
Write 88.4
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 160
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
204% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 88%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 164 166 167 166 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 145
Mixed 85
SusWrite 166
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 97%
SanDisk' Cruzer Fit 16GB
14GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 7.1 7.1 6.5 6.6 7.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
9.56% Terrible
Read 24
Write 17.9
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 7.3
21% 16.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2.7
147% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.56%
Great: 19%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
4.5TB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 154 157 157 163 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
60% Above average
Read 67.1
Write 134
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 160
154% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.7
196% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 60%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 46.1
MC Mixed 37.2
118% 41.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 50.8
SC Mixed 33.1
101% 35.5 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 115%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING - $275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $872
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback