MSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics93.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B85
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85)  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '22 at 22:35
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 57.9
1-Core 130
2-Core 253
77% 147 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 374
46% 351 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 58%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.6% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 129
Parallax 119
95% 121 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 119
Splatting 108
91% 112 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 328 265 305 133 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 481
Mixed 381
SusWrite 252
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 58.7
190% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 111%
Great: 134%
PNY CS2211 480GB-$70
88GB free
Firmware: CS221016
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 398 438 452 447 430 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 478
Mixed 378
SusWrite 419
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 39.7
145% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 371
DQ Mixed 192
192% 308 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 107%
Great: 113%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
328GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 385 421 434 432 410 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 438
Mixed 334
SusWrite 403
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 40.6
141% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 296
242% 343 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 104%
Great: 125%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 122 1.3 0 12 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 140
Write 80.9
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 48.5
57% 78 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.9
312% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 107%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
12.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 205 212 208 200 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 207
Write 214
Mixed 210
SusWrite 207
288% 210 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 1.4
402% 7.27 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 9.7
DQ Mixed 1.7
391% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 106%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
69.6% Good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 28.4
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 27.6
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85) Builds (Compare 4,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85) - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $558
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback