Asus PRIME Q270M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Q270M-C  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '22 at 14:59
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 87
1-Core 120
2-Core 235
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 632
65% 524 Pts
64-Core 628
39% 628 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 37.2
Reflection 41.2
Parallax 38
30% 38.8 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 27.6
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 310 310 310 311 310 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 423
Mixed 374
SusWrite 309
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 55.2
190% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 327
246% 331 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 111%
Great: 122%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
3TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 149 149 151 150 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 156
Write 151
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 147
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87%
Great: 88%
SMI USB DISK 32GB
20GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 6.4 2.8 3.7 6.4 2.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
9.79% Terrible
Read 40.5
Write 7.5
Mixed 14.6
SusWrite 4.3
17% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.9
70% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.79%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.4% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 24
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 24.5
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Q270M-C Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Q270M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $167
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback