Asus Rampage III Extreme

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus Rampage III Extreme (all builds)
Memory	19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100716
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 28 '22 at 09:35
Run Duration	259 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 90.4 1-Core 85 2-Core 171 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 518 53% 429 Pts	64-Core 640 40% 640 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Asus(1043 842E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (54^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.9% Below average	Lighting 35.5 Reflection 36.3 Parallax 48.7 29% 40.2 fps	MRender 49 Gravity 44.6 Splatting 36.8 35% 43.5 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 90 113 117 59 30 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.5% Very poor	Read 96.5 Write 161 Mixed 60.1 SusWrite 85.6 23% 101 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 18.6 4K Mixed 8.8 30% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 18.2 DQ Write 27.3 DQ Mixed 7.8 10% 17.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 598GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 130 Write 12.7 Mixed 20.9 SusWrite 13.3 32% 44.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 108%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180 4,231 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 223GB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 87 87 90 89 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 86.7 Write 89.9 Mixed 51.1 SusWrite 89.3 58% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.2 204% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 97%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 10 9.6 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	40% Below average	Read 129 Write 10.2 Mixed 16.4 SusWrite 9.9 30% 41.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 109% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 127 126 127 128 125 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 122 Write 127 Mixed 72.3 SusWrite 126 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion+ 5TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 843GB free, PID 2323 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 94 95 95 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Read 51.7 Write 76.8 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 94.2 104% 72.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.5 169% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 58%
Seagate Expansion+ 5TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 494GB free, PID 2323 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 69 75 76 76 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	38.2% Below average	Read 51.1 Write 72.4 Mixed 65.3 SusWrite 74.3 94% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.5 179% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 58%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 2,527 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 388GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 31.3 Write 28.4 Mixed 20.4 SusWrite 29.1 36% 27.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	44.6% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 14.1 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 12.5 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Rampage III Extreme Builds (Compare 742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 77%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 65%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus Rampage III Extreme

CPU
Core i7 X 980Intel $148Bench 76%, 8,133 samples	146x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	128x
Core i7 X 990Intel $499Bench 78%, 4,994 samples	94x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	57x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	39x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	39x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	22x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	21x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	20x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	172x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	86x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	80x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $628

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16