Lenovo 11D0CTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive296% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 11D0CTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 315F
Memory86.9 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210927
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateMay 28 '22 at 14:30
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900-$276
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 83.6
1-Core 147
2-Core 289
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 980
92% 766 Pts
64-Core 1,853
115% 1,853 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Lighting 97.1
Reflection 91.5
Parallax 79.6
79% 89.4 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 81
Splatting 72.5
60% 73 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB2T0HALB-000L7 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4M2QEXG7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2046 2034 2030 2012 1928 1719 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 2,259
Write 2,252
Mixed 1,623
SusWrite 1,962
456% 2,024 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 52.5
181% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 952
DQ Write 415
DQ Mixed 366
355% 578 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 296%
Great: 369%
Jajs600m 2TB 2TB
546GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 367 348 353 360 363 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
65% Good
Read 398
Write 349
Mixed 329
SusWrite 359
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 19.9
74% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 98.4
DQ Mixed 46.3
50% 84 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65%
Great: 88%
Adata XPG EX500 500GB
104GB free
Firmware: 9301
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 72 74 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 59.2
Write 56.4
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 73.7
44% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 66%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
193GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 116 112 115 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 106
Write 114
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 114
67% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
77GB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 112 105 116 116 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 82.2
Write 102
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 112
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
53% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 106%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
213GB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 89 89 88 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 76
Write 76.5
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 87.3
87% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A4G43AB2-CVF 85F7 W644GU44J1293NH 85F7 W644GU44J1293NH 95GB
2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.3% Very good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.3
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 22.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 11D0CTO1WW Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

System: Lenovo 11D0CTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $600
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback