Asus P7H55D-M EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 13 years old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
18 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P7H55D-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory16.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '22 at 15:45
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7 860-$262
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 152
69% 110 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 376
40% 313 Pts
64-Core 375
25% 375 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Asus(1043 8469) 3GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.1% Average
Lighting 50.9
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 69.2
41% 60 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 60.4
Splatting 52.3
50% 60.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 52%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$52
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 122 122 112 101 103 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.1% Below average
Read 248
Write 124
Mixed 158
SusWrite 107
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 11.2
46% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 11.1
DQ Mixed 19.6
36% 77.4 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 126%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$23
74GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 34 34 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 93
Write 36.3
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 33.8
38% 51.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$40
53GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 34 34 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 67.8
Write 32.2
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 33.8
30% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 12.4
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 12.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P7H55D-M EVO Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7H55D-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $456
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $275Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $470Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3070 $535Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $350Nvidia RTX 3050 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $449SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback