User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP
MotherboardHP 8266
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170619
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 29 '22 at 01:53
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A10-9700E R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 47.3
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 104
42% 72.3 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 157
17% 135 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 8266) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
5.59% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 10.2
6% 8.27 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 6.4
5% 5.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.59%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPRE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 59 61 42 38 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 69.5
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 46.8
29% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SF4641G8CKHIWDFSEG 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
23.1% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.9
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback