HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '22 at 19:13
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 232
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 696
70% 567 Pts
64-Core 845
52% 845 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$394
HP(103C 8552) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 164
Reflection 167
Parallax 169
134% 167 fps
Splatting 125
129% 125 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
878GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1749 1328 1330 1449 1246 904 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,215
Write 2,057
Mixed 610
SusWrite 1,334
295% 1,304 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 56.7
207% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,095
DQ Write 846
DQ Mixed 904
694% 948 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 237%
Great: 410%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OAC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 190 192 192 193 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 194
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 192
109% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
SanDisk Cruzer 16GB
11GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 4.3 4.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 21.2
Write 13.7
Mixed 12.4
SusWrite 4
16% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.6
174% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 17%
Mass Storage Device 120GB
63GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 40
Write 40.4
Mixed 39
SusWrite 41.2
55% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 13.1
1,016% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 12.6
DQ Write 17
DQ Mixed 13.6
1,088% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$114
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.6% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.5
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 22
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback