Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190912
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 06 '22 at 00:10
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 75.8 1-Core 102 2-Core 202 71% 127 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 638 60% 496 Pts	64-Core 839 52% 839 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% EVGA(3842 2062) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (59 fps cap detected)	48.2% Average	Lighting 59 Reflection 59 Parallax 59 48% 59 fps	MRender 59 Gravity 59 Splatting 59 48% 59 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
INTENSO 240GB 887 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: T1125A0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 444 Write 329 Mixed 321 81% 365 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 69.3 4K Mixed 16.1 86% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 0.8 64% 149 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 104%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB 46,239 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 419GB free Firmware: M6CR030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 49 47 294 291 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 436 Write 50.1 Mixed 50 SusWrite 145 37% 170 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 30.7 4K Mixed 0.8 48% 17.3 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 48.5 DQ Mixed 0.8 28% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 100%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75 52,084 User benchmarks, average bench 200% 825GB free Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1002 1002 969 1110 1416 1538 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	190% Outstanding	Read 871 Write 1,096 Mixed 764 SusWrite 1,173 221% 976 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 97.4 4K Mixed 51.8 175% 62.3 MB/s	DQ Read 706 DQ Write 590 DQ Mixed 770 544% 689 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 299%
WD WD10JUCX-63WPNY0 1TB 494 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 217GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 94 100 93 99 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Read 74.7 Write 85.9 Mixed 46.2 SusWrite 96.3 56% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 64%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 738GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 118 116 119 114 120 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 79.1 Write 120 Mixed 36.2 SusWrite 118 64% 88.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 72%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 196GB free Firmware: AX002J SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 84 90 81 89 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 83.9 Write 85.9 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 86 52% 72.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 62%
WD My Passport 25E2 2TB 8,938 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 451GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 50 49 51 45 51 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Read 75 Write 84.8 Mixed 45.4 SusWrite 49 84% 63.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP32D4U8S8HD-8XR 2x8GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	MC Read 38.9 MC Write 32.4 MC Mixed 31.7 98% 34.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 27.5 SC Mixed 24.7 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 88.7 45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)