| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1495 |
| Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20111110 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 04 '17 at 21:10 |
| Run Duration | 221 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 21% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.1%
Good
|
67% 112 Pts
|
37% 281 Pts
|
20% 324 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 1809 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.95
|
33.6%
Below average
|
34% 38.3 fps
|
32% 39.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
61.9%
Good
|
71% 323 MB/s
|
75% 25.6 MB/s
|
43% 90.5 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32
716GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC57 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
98%
Outstanding
|
117% 156 MB/s
|
83% 0.84 MB/s
| |
|
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB
249GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
10%
Very poor
|
31% 24.9 MB/s
|
20% 0.32 MB/s
| |
|
|
12.2%
Very poor
|
18% 16.3 MB/s
|
96% 2.08 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B5173BH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.4%
Average
|
46% 16.2 GB/s
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
58% 68.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,259 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 1,668x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 553x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 545x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 1,776x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 275x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 238x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |