Asrock FM2A88X+ Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A88X+ Killer (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '17 at 14:19
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135 9,821 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Memory 80.6 1-Core 70.4 2-Core 139 59% 96.7 Pts	4-Core 179 8-Core 200 25% 190 Pts	64-Core 218 14% 218 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% EVGA(3842 6160) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (98^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (70 fps cap detected)	57% Above average	Lighting 70.1 Reflection 69 Parallax 61.5 57% 66.8 fps	MRender 71.3 Gravity 66.5 Splatting 70.3 57% 69.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 240GB-$141 6,458 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: OC34L5TA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 381 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 17697 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 208 (64) Unknown 100 100 6414400 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 0 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 95 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 0 0 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 97 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 9502 (B3) Unknown 0 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 37 100 214749478949 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 381 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 215 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 381 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 15594 (F1) Unknown 100 100 12427 (F2) Unknown 100 100 13108 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 11213	121% Outstanding	Read 1,152 Write 580 Mixed 602 171% 778 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 65.2 4K Mixed 16.6 108% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 20 61% 135 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 159%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 460GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 218103304 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3211 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 7471102 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 17552 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 197 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 70 454688794 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 42 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 13608 (C2) HDA temperature 26 40 60129542170 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 106914620904118 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4888487971 (F2) Unknown 100 253 23818553727	78.2% Very good	Read 140 Write 133 Mixed 135 102% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.22 90% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GB 1,884 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2132 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.2% Average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 19 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 12.5 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A88X+ Killer Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X+ Killer - $150

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	15x
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	10x
A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 45%, 11,026 samples	8x

GPU
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	12x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	10x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	5x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
SSDSC2BB080G4 80GBIntelBench 76%, 6 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	7x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 9,036 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $437

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16