Asus P9X79

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 (all builds)
Memory	29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140724
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 18 '17 at 02:36
Run Duration	794 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Memory 89 1-Core 99.5 2-Core 186 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 578 59% 477 Pts	64-Core 712 44% 712 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 8504) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.9% Above average	Lighting 69.3 Reflection 69.2 Parallax 56.4 56% 65 fps	MRender 78.6 Gravity 71.6 Splatting 64.8 58% 71.7 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 35257537 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 99729140621412 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 198 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 166 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 29 38 77311901725 (C2) HDA temperature 29 38 77311901725 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 35257537 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 35257537 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 35257537 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1406 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1178 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1178 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1015	69.3% Good	Read 517 Write 223 Mixed 268 74% 336 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 17.6 88% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 235 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 90.9 97% 163 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 94%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 568GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 164 145 8783 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 390 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 29413 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 261 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 219 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 171 171 89452 (C2) HDA temperature 114 102 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 5 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 5 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 5	34.7% Below average	Read 63.7 Write 57.2 Mixed 57.8 45% 59.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.06 4K Mixed 0.23 67% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 230GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 193 193 7578 (03) Spinup time 183 179 5816 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 372 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 23135 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 256 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 214 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 190 190 32356 (C2) HDA temperature 113 104 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 196 196 2122 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 196 196 2100 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 195 195 2121	3.11% Terrible	Read 0.23 Write 9.94 Mixed 59.3 19% 23.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.25 79% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 3.11% Great: 83%
Lexar JumpDrive S23 USB 3.0 64GB-$38 319 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 21GB free, PID a833 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 38.1 Write 15.9 Mixed 16 26% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.33 4K Write 0.68 4K Mixed 0.55 54% 1.52 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 645 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	MC Read 35.8 MC Write 33.9 MC Mixed 31.7 97% 33.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 12.1 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 58%

Gunboat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 47%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	647x
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	361x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	229x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	96x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	85x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	84x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	53x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	52x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	42x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	53x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	38x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $512

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16