Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3-$245 2,834 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	68.7% Good	Memory 86 1-Core 65.4 2-Core 128 58% 93 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 568 50% 423 Pts	64-Core 569 35% 569 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000D 1,102 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Nvidia(10DE 096F) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	8.26% Terrible	Lighting 9.3 Reflection 8.46 Parallax 10.6 8% 9.44 fps	MRender 12.2 Gravity 11 Splatting 11.8 10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.26% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Read 493 Write 342 Mixed 336 86% 390 MB/s	4K Read 41.8 4K Write 68 4K Mixed 19.6 124% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 43.1 DQ Write 74 DQ Mixed 68.9 49% 62 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 108%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 883GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	82% Excellent	Read 135 Write 151 Mixed 137 106% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.97 4K Write 2.44 4K Mixed 0.22 110% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 2x4GB 14,558 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 15.9 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 12.1 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16