Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	89.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '18 at 19:20
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 71.5 1-Core 117 2-Core 215 75% 135 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 858 76% 644 Pts	64-Core 1191 74% 1191 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2127 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 119 Parallax 116 90% 115 fps	MRender 100 Gravity 108 Splatting 109 87% 106 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 437GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	220% Outstanding	Read 2,135 Write 1,459 Mixed 1,275 359% 1,623 MB/s	4K Read 45.4 4K Write 81.6 4K Mixed 22.8 141% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 43.5 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 97 75% 98.7 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 220% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 239GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4312 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2578 (B1) Unknown 99 99 31 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 53 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 226 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16991822624	97.9% Outstanding	Read 522 Write 498 Mixed 515 114% 512 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 92.7 4K Mixed 21.2 128% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 21 67% 146 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 124%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 238GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10577 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 7162 (B1) Unknown 96 96 117 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 47 24 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 48 (EB) Unknown 99 99 943 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21787792031	72.7% Very good	Read 510 Write 386 Mixed 438 99% 445 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 67.4 4K Mixed 15.8 88% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 21.9 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 13.6 25% 45.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 86%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$25 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 223GB free Firmware: Z22000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 41 100 41 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1194 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 20 (A9) Unknown 100 100 24 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 16 (AE) Unknown 100 100 11 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 68 100 188978561056 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2685 (F1) Unknown 253 253 2060 (F2) Unknown 253 253 2146	68.8% Good	Read 499 Write 367 Mixed 424 96% 430 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 78.2 4K Mixed 4.08 84% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 21.6 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 24.6 34% 59.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 86%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 188GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5446 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4523 (B1) Unknown 99 99 8 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 47 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 681 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3731292993	70.8% Very good	Read 505 Write 245 Mixed 356 81% 369 MB/s	4K Read 39.9 4K Write 63.3 4K Mixed 17.3 116% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 35.2 DQ Write 57.5 DQ Mixed 16.4 21% 36.4 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3400 C16 2x8GB 1,517 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.2% Very good	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 25.5 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 24.2 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 97.9 41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $1,042

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)