QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory22.6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 22.6GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory20.5 GB free of 22.5527 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '18 at 19:04
Run Duration69 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core i7 9xx (Nehalem Class Core i7)
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 15 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 55.2
1-Core 62.7
2-Core 129
47% 82.2 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 452
42% 349 Pts
64-Core 627
39% 627 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32% Below average
Read 65
Write 46.5
Mixed 50.6
41% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 0.16
4K Mixed 0.28
57% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 32%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 22GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 6710 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.5% Above average
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 21
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback