Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V LX (all builds)
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120717
Uptime	6.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 05 '18 at 13:41
Run Duration	395 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 90.1 2-Core 170 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 475 48% 387 Pts	64-Core 483 30% 483 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.1% Average	Lighting 47.6 Reflection 54.9 Parallax 44.3 39% 49 fps	MRender 67.7 Gravity 47.5 Splatting 62 48% 59 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 86GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6580 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 671 (B1) Unknown 94 94 28 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 80 57 20 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 25 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14284170123	51.6% Above average	Read 254 Write 138 Mixed 143 39% 179 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 30.9 4K Mixed 22 88% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 98.3 DQ Mixed 53.7 63% 112 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 123%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 39GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1450 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 139 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 61 24 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 4 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3979826820	68.3% Good	Read 267 Write 210 Mixed 217 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 50.2 4K Mixed 35.2 120% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 195 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 78.6 84% 140 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 21682 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1782 (B1) Unknown 77 77 230 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 79 62 21 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 141 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1747457979	46.7% Average	Read 427 Write 45.2 Mixed 104 41% 192 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 9.66 73% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 64.2 DQ Mixed 25.4 47% 97.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 570GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 60986589 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7783 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 360646834 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 32579 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3208 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 51540394191 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 61 386924567 (C2) HDA temperature 23 40 30064771095 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 43 23 60986589 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -39148626860816 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2971370423 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1655802439	57.1% Above average	Read 104 Write 95.2 Mixed 93.1 73% 97.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.39 88% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 68%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 194 Write 178 Mixed 129 207% 167 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.19 58% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 74%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 152 Write 149 Mixed 96.3 165% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.19 59% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 74%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 366GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 177 Write 145 Mixed 119 181% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.26 58% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 69%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 359GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 136 Write 157 Mixed 58.3 145% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.28 45% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 80%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB 134 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 258GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	45.3% Average	Read 107 Write 114 Mixed 103 140% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.17 62% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 73%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 241GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 76.2 Write 83.2 Mixed 57.2 92% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.19 71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 43%
STM31000 528AS 1TB 78GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.3% Below average	Read 71.9 Write 83 Mixed 70.8 98% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.32 54% 0.75 MB/s

ST332081 3AS 320GB 63GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.4% Average	Read 99.6 Write 106 Mixed 57.2 109% 87.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.22 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.32 42% 0.48 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 16,567 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	56% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 18.2 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 15.4 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,403x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,164x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	1,071x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	374x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	366x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	301x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	214x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	195x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	149x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	138x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	131x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	105x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $364

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16