Hp-pavilion VS249AA-UUW 600-1050sc

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion VS249AA-UUW 600-1050sc  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON E60
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091105
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 15 '18 at 19:46
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo P7450-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 63.7
1-Core 25.2
2-Core 41.5
32% 43.5 Pts
4-Core 46.3
8-Core 47.8
6% 47 Pts
64-Core 54.5
3% 54.5 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 230
Device(1B0A 903B) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.17.11.9819
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.34% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 1.16
2% 2.64 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 1.97
Splatting 3
3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.34%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
782GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 83
Write 89.1
Mixed 35
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.29
77% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
15.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 4.7
14% 5.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback