Hp-pavilion NY428AAR-ABA p6110f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 5 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemHp-pavilion NY428AAR-ABA p6110f  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Benicia
Memory4.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090910
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateApr 08 '18 at 20:13
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Pentium E5300-$25
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
SC Int 62.8
SC Float 37.1
SC Mixed 44.6
39% 48.2 Pts
QC Int 122
QC Float 65.2
QC Mixed 74
20% 86.9 Pts
MC Int 120
MC Float 72.1
MC Mixed 88.1
14% 93.3 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 23%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
MSI(1462 1612) 512MB
Driver: atidxx32 Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 4.6
2% 5.37 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 3.8
1% 3.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$72
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 82.4
Write 67
Mixed 63.3
53% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.26
80% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$25
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP22 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 92.9
Write 82.2
Mixed 46.3
55% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.47
87% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$11
25GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 20.4
Mixed 17
27% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.22
4K Write 0.59
4K Mixed 0.59
56% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
15.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.4
14% 4.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical NY428AAR-ABA p6110f Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Hp-pavilion NY428AAR-ABA p6110f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $25
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $363Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $63
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $149Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $115SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $780SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $125SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback