MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B79
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180403
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 02 '18 at 12:54
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Memory 87.9 1-Core 124 2-Core 246 85% 153 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 951 85% 720 Pts	64-Core 1,314 81% 1,314 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2156 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 397.31 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Lighting 74.3 Reflection 72.3 Parallax 63.7 60% 70.1 fps	MRender 75 Gravity 70.9 Splatting 73.2 60% 73 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199 19,348 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 24094767442311 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1251 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 315 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 110 110 29840272 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 315 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 648158 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 55 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 648158 (F2) Unknown 100 100 823270 (F9) Unknown 100 100 19456	71.5% Very good	Read 509 Write 148 Mixed 226 64% 294 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 79.9 4K Mixed 18 117% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 58.5 78% 143 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 88%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 253GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 199 0 (03) Spinup time 171 166 6441 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4550 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 56 56 32154 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3374 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 208 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 48 48 458055 (C2) HDA temperature 121 108 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 30325 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	52.6% Above average	Read 95.2 Write 88 Mixed 71.8 64% 85 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.24 78% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 67%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 65GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 171 168 2425 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1675 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 17171 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1070 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 94 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1587 (C2) HDA temperature 114 100 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	79.3% Very good	Read 137 Write 140 Mixed 129 102% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.23 4K Write 2.35 4K Mixed 0.25 122% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 46GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 134 134 34387853741 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 742 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9883 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 702 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1001 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1001 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 197569347615 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	111% Outstanding	Read 199 Write 187 Mixed 157 136% 181 MB/s	4K Read 1.14 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.2 101% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 42.9 MC Write 36.9 MC Mixed 32.9 107% 37.6 GB/s	SC Read 26 SC Write 39.9 SC Mixed 28.3 90% 31.4 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 1,479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $112

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	430x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	208x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	184x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	99x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	76x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	73x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	66x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	60x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	56x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	83x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	75x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	64x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $608

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $112

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)