Asus PRIME X399-A

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	96.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X399-A (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170906
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 18 '18 at 18:59
Run Duration	423 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 54.5 1-Core 112 2-Core 231 70% 132 Pts	4-Core 461 8-Core 780 75% 620 Pts	64-Core 2,421 150% 2,421 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3717) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	96.1% Outstanding	Lighting 121 Reflection 135 Parallax 115 99% 124 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 124 Splatting 103 91% 112 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	171% Outstanding	Read 2,601 Write 531 Mixed 847 286% 1,326 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 49.5 4K Mixed 26 100% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 71 DQ Mixed 46.1 47% 77.3 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 171% Great: 340%
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49 13,478 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 126GB free Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1599 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 465 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 66 (A3) Unknown 100 100 25 (A4) Unknown 100 100 45148 (A5) Unknown 100 100 253 (A6) Unknown 100 100 8 (A7) Unknown 100 100 42 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 26 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 138 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 35262 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 363841 (F2) Unknown 100 100 258805 (F5) Unknown 100 100 722368	73.4% Very good	Read 514 Write 431 Mixed 474 106% 473 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 35.8 4K Mixed 22.3 75% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 74.9 DQ Write 66.6 DQ Mixed 37.4 37% 59.6 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 113GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 16964 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 455 (B1) Unknown 95 95 104 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 55 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 148 (F1) Unknown 99 99 40731555621	75.1% Very good	Read 510 Write 407 Mixed 421 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 23.2 88% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 76 DQ Write 59.9 DQ Mixed 31 33% 55.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 168 160 6558 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 933 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 72 (07) Seek error rate 200 198 0 (09) Power-on hours count 62 62 27930 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 417 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 138 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5625 (C2) HDA temperature 115 105 35 (C4) Reallocation count 196 196 4 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 2 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 5	65.1% Good	Read 112 Write 114 Mixed 107 84% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.98 4K Mixed 0.21 93% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 67%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41 64,201 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 931GB free Firmware: SM11 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 86 59249080 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 613 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 213901575 (09) Power-on hours count 64 64 31888 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 630 (B8) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 7105 (BC) Unknown 100 99 65550 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 119 (BE) vendor-specific 69 51 555417631 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 406 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 82 82 36460 (C2) HDA temperature 31 49 64424509471 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	57.7% Above average	Read 88.9 Write 111 Mixed 93.4 74% 97.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 5.43 4K Mixed 0.65 204% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 65%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 32GB 2,787 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 25GB free, PID 556b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	8.59% Terrible	Read 16.6 Write 10.5 Mixed 11.5 16% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.94 4K Mixed 1.43 96% 2.22 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.59% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-156.A00G 2x8GB 105 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	42.2% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 14 42% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 14.8 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X399-A Builds (Compare 526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X399-A

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	185x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	124x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	74x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	33x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	24x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	22x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	22x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 10,311 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $160Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $932

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16