Asus B85M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-E (all builds)
Memory	18.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170721
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 19 '18 at 05:01
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 107 2-Core 203 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 547 55% 447 Pts	64-Core 571 35% 571 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Lighting 135 Reflection 142 Parallax 121 110% 132 fps	MRender 104 Gravity 128 Splatting 108 93% 113 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 112GB free Firmware: 5.24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4380830 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 -833223629044 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 195 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 94 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 36 41 51542294564 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4380830 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4380830 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4380830 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 13276 (EA) Unknown 0 0 4202 (F1) Unknown 0 0 4202 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2218	75.2% Very good	Read 496 Write 180 Mixed 238 67% 305 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 97.8 4K Mixed 19.3 123% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 57 80% 148 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 83%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$46 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 5 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 3 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 58 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 826352100	59.8% Above average	Read 265 Write 203 Mixed 210 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 69.9 4K Mixed 20.3 111% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 33.1 DQ Write 151 DQ Mixed 27.7 40% 70.5 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 128%
WD WD10EACS-22D6B0 4TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 69 64 8566843 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 340 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 19185492 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 128827544045534 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 279 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 60 572522528 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 111 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6264 (C2) HDA temperature 32 40 73014444064 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -139225659865525 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2890174420 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1466682365	94.6% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 162 Mixed 129 114% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.27 88% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 0420 F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 0420 F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.2% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 14 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 15.7 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-E Builds (Compare 2,925 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-E - $106

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	397x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	321x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	258x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	326x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	200x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	175x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	96x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	91x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	80x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	53x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	37x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16