HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Z400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory	8.5 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1768 x 992 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111102
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 07 '18 at 14:50
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3565 7,121 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 87.1 1-Core 81.7 2-Core 164 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 332 44% 330 Pts	64-Core 330 20% 330 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 0780) 2GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 372.95 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 128GB 239 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 16262 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 5743 (B1) Unknown 91 91 297 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 61 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 204 (F1) Unknown 99 99 34784253477	36.9% Below average	Read 263 Write 131 Mixed 136 39% 177 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 26 4K Mixed 11.5 48% 16.9 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 23.5 DQ Mixed 25.8 34% 64.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 117%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00WN9B0 3TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 981GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 28.4 Write 25.1 Mixed 25.5 33% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.25 77% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 53%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00WN9B0 3TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 824GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Read 28.4 Write 25.3 Mixed 23.2 32% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 2.07 4K Mixed 0.23 81% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 53%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00WN9B0 3TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 441GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 25.1 Mixed 21.4 31% 25.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.25 76% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 53%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB 134 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 9GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 25.9 Mixed 27.2 35% 27.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.2 60% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT325U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT325U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT325U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT325U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT325U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT325U7BFR8C-H9 46GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	43% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 16.7 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 10.4 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	569x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	534x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	487x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	272x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	155x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	137x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	73x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	65x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16