Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 65% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	59.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180622
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '18 at 20:17
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	76%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Memory 97.1 1-Core 152 2-Core 306 102% 185 Pts	4-Core 613 8-Core 1,035 100% 824 Pts	64-Core 1,299 80% 1,299 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3283) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.93 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.2% Above average	Lighting 73.8 Reflection 74.8 Parallax 65.5 60% 71.4 fps	MRender 69.9 Gravity 68.5 Splatting 71.1 57% 69.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135 28,136 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 212 213 211 132 56 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 993 Write 472 Mixed 319 SusWrite 178 108% 490 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 44.6 162% 64.6 MB/s	DQ Read 608 DQ Write 518 DQ Mixed 370 330% 499 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 144%
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221 10,770 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 238GB free Firmware: Z2333000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 313 323 325 326 324 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Read 494 Write 322 Mixed 230 SusWrite 315 76% 340 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 92.9 4K Mixed 15.4 109% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 87 106% 182 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 84%
Sandisk SD8SBBU240G1122 240GB 2,683 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 62GB free Firmware: Z3107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 210 121 109 115 115 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Read 406 Write 402 Mixed 348 SusWrite 167 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 84.7 4K Mixed 17.5 102% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 28.2 78% 163 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 66%
Intel 335 Series 240GB-$219 4,220 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 51GB free Firmware: 335u SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 201 209 215 210 235 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Read 398 Write 264 Mixed 289 SusWrite 206 65% 289 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 45.7 175% 65.4 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 248 DQ Mixed 250 193% 264 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 92%
Thnsf5256gpuk TOSHIBA 256GB 2,882 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 44GB free Firmware: 51045KLA SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 229 250 125 120 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 824 Write 269 Mixed 375 SusWrite 176 90% 411 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 50.9 189% 76.3 MB/s	DQ Read 570 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 370 292% 412 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 133%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: AX1P2C SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 110 110 110 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	63% Good	Read 110 Write 112 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 109 66% 90.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$161 35,811 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	MC Read 38.3 MC Write 38.8 MC Mixed 27 99% 34.7 GB/s	SC Read 24 SC Write 44.3 SC Mixed 31.4 95% 33.2 GB/s	Latency 50 80% 50 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,511x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	832x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	573x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	401x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	346x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	338x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	115x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	145x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	90x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $844

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16