PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Asus Z10PE-D8 WS (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS |
Memory | 121.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160622 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jul 11 '18 at 21:06 |
Run Duration | 385 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
65.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.2.1
|
56.6%
Above average
|
|||
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
|
32.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 71 71 72 71 MB/s
|
41.4%
Average
|
|||
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB
34GB free
Firmware: 0006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 134 134 133 134 MB/s
|
59.1%
Above average
|
|||
16.5%
Very poor
|
||||
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
261GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 75 75 75 75 MB/s
|
44.8%
Average
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$164
650GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 121 132 132 123 100 MB/s
|
44%
Average
|
|||
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -SD 524GB
131GB free, PID 0307
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 23 27 30 28 25 MB/s
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
|||
USB Flash Disk 4GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.9 5.2 5.2 5.9 5.9 MB/s
|
6.05%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
96.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples | 20x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 20x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples | 16x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 36x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 21x |
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples | 19x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $653 |