Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130920
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '18 at 16:47
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 86.8 1-Core 81.4 2-Core 162 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 303 39% 296 Pts	64-Core 300 19% 300 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 70%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 1495) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.02% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 0.97 1% 1.16 fps	MRender 1.76 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.96 1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.02% Great: 1%
Nvidia GeForce 310 4,147 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 0733) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.23% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2.58 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.46 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 2 2% 1.94 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.23% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 273GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 102 89 101 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 123 Write 124 Mixed 58.8 SusWrite 95.9 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 320GB-$29 3,408 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 104GB free Firmware: KC65 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 108 110 110 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 108 Write 105 Mixed 59 SusWrite 109 70% 95.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.9 144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 65%
Kingston DT 101 G2 4GB 1,620 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 4.4 4.1 4.4 4.5 4.8 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	4.52% Terrible	Read 18.7 Write 6.5 Mixed 10 SusWrite 4.2 11% 9.85 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.52% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 RMR1870EC58E9F1333 8GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.2% Below average	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 8.9 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 8.9 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,776x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	275x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	238x

RAM
9905584-014.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 436 samples	38x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	37x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	22x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16