HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory16.9 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 24 '18 at 17:49
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Xeon W3690-$990
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
69.4% Good
SC Int 83.6
SC Float 90.9
SC Mixed 87.1
70% 87.2 Pts
QC Int 331
QC Float 356
QC Mixed 345
78% 344 Pts
MC Int 612
MC Float 645
MC Mixed 638
95% 632 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750 Ti-$110
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Lighting 65.9
Reflection 44.2
Parallax 67.4
21% 59.2 fps
MRender 54
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 40.8
24% 54.1 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 25%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 4,030
Write 4,292
Mixed 4,005
920% 4,109 MB/s
4K Read 572
4K Write 357
4K Mixed 262
1,392% 397 MB/s
DQ Read 1050
DQ Write 720
DQ Mixed 433
445% 734 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 123%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$85
453GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 201 200 201 201 201 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.1% Good
Read 230
Write 226
Mixed 223
SusWrite 201
50% 220 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 42
137% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 33.3
DQ Write 88.3
DQ Mixed 46.5
40% 56 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
144GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 93 93 93 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 161
Write 126
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 93.1
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$100
403GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 94 94 96 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 94
Write 67.8
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 94.7
55% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 106%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 126 127 128 127 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 113
Write 113
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 127
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
177% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-CH9 ID:01 98 HP669238-071-HYC ID:80 AD HMT351U7EFR8C-PB 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.3% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 16.7
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 46%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $500
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $160SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback