Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD
Memory	4.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160128
Uptime	9.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '18 at 04:15
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	49%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 73.4 1-Core 88.2 2-Core 150 62% 104 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 528 43% 373 Pts	64-Core 507 31% 507 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 80%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	5.16% Terrible	Lighting 7.47 Reflection 9.69 Parallax 7.09 6% 8.08 fps	MRender 7.1 Gravity 6.9 Splatting 0.13 3% 4.71 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.16% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 86DC) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.93 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	20.2% Poor	Lighting 25.8 Reflection 25.3 Parallax 11.9 21% 21 fps	MRender 31.6 Gravity 22.6 Splatting 16.4 18% 23.5 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 96 96 93 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 62.5 Write 177 Mixed 29.5 SusWrite 92.4 65% 90.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.7 327% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ASU21D4U5S8MB-8 2x8GB 1,185 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 17.7 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 11.5 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 93.7 43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD Builds (Compare 1,487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	680x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	539x
Core i3-6098PIntelBench 62%, 6,133 samples	101x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	206x
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	105x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	82x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	50x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	37x

RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples	248x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	221x
HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 2x4GBHynixBench 68%, 8,569 samples	53x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $107

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16