Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 73.7 1-Core 108 2-Core 214 73% 132 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 712 67% 554 Pts	64-Core 956 59% 956 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120 38,521 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(174B E258) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.5.1 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Lighting 25.6 Reflection 28.5 Parallax 29.7 21% 27.9 fps	MRender 25.3 Gravity 22.3 Splatting 29.7 22% 25.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 6,336 Write 5,112 Mixed 5,512 1,259% 5,653 MB/s	4K Read 387 4K Write 242 4K Mixed 261 1,049% 297 MB/s	DQ Read 651 DQ Write 755 DQ Mixed 303 339% 570 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128 11,448 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 559GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.1 2.3 2.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 112 Write 2 Mixed 24.3 SusWrite 2.3 26% 35.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42 105,447 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	89% Excellent	MC Read 34.6 MC Write 33.1 MC Mixed 29.7 93% 32.5 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 25.4 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 93.2 43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	74x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	72x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	55x

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $490

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16