PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7885 |
Motherboard | MSI X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885) (all builds) |
Memory | 4.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160715 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Aug 05 '18 at 01:37 |
Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
Run User | NOR-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
71.9%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.7.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 287 308 321 320 312 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
190GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 452 461 460 442 288 MB/s
|
104%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 3x4GB
3 of 8 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
50.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 446x |
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 87x |
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 34x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples | 56x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 50x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 42x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 40% - Below average | Total price: $1,014 |