Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display2560x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '18 at 16:49
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$173
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 97.8
1-Core 133
2-Core 264
93% 165 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 774
80% 646 Pts
64-Core 748
46% 748 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 97%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Palit(1569 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1476 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 25.1
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 23.3
20% 22.8 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 25
Splatting 19.7
20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,488
Write 8,780
Mixed 8,313
1,908% 8,527 MB/s
4K Read 730
4K Write 407
4K Mixed 391
1,824% 510 MB/s
DQ Read 2,170
DQ Write 1,663
DQ Mixed 1,738
1,348% 1,857 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
68GB free
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 96 88 91 96 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 479
Write 386
Mixed 371
SusWrite 120
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 24.2
133% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 33.1
81% 164 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 71%
HP S700 120GB-$30
112GB free
Firmware: Q1204B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 453 454 457 456 456 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 458
Mixed 414
SusWrite 456
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 29.1
148% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 44.5
91% 179 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 103%
Great: 95%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
801GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 76 79 81 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 49.5
Write 48.8
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 78.8
39% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 51%
WD My Passport 0741 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0741
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 95 95 95 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 100
Write 101
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 94.8
118% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3274 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 43
MC Write 44.5
MC Mixed 30.8
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 45.4
SC Mixed 33.3
97% 33.9 GB/s
Latency 46.9
85% 46.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 111%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $650
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback