Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '18 at 19:14
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 83.3
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 110
53% 83.7 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 267
30% 232 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24.6% Poor
Lighting 29.8
Reflection 32.1
Parallax 35.4
24% 32.5 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 37.5
25% 29.8 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 126 143 141 132 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 284
Write 199
Mixed 214
SusWrite 141
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 26.4
89% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 139
115% 163 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 85%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$40
859GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 96 121 123 133 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 10.5
Write 13.5
Mixed 10.3
SusWrite 109
26% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 85%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
285GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 71 74 72 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 76
Write 78
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 71.1
48% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 59%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
931GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 116 116 117 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 111
Write 104
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 116
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 84%
MB0500EAMZD 500GB
160GB free
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 56 62 65 73 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 57.7
Write 89
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 62.4
43% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.4
90% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.9% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 15.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 10.3
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback