Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive15.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120106
Uptime10.4 Days
Run DateAug 30 '18 at 07:33
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 54
2-Core 90.6
49% 74.7 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 254
25% 203 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 28.8
Parallax 31.4
20% 28.1 fps
MRender 30.9
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 33.2
24% 29.3 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$35
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFR71.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 25 3.7 0.4 4.9 10 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.4% Very poor
Read 123
Write 83.8
Mixed 90
SusWrite 16.3
17% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 7.6
25% 8.57 MB/s
DQ Read 21.4
DQ Write 50.7
DQ Mixed 25.1
22% 32.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 93%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
34GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 44 40 30 11 5.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
22% Poor
Read 46.5
Write 78.5
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 29.9
36% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 22%
Great: 85%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
22GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 25 5.4 1.1 9.3 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 129
Write 107
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 19.9
58% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 100%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 94 104 106 107 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 138
Write 106
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 103
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 100%
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$323
2GB free
Firmware: 01.01L01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 94
Write 77.3
Mixed 48.5
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 93%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8
7GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 7.8 8.6 8.6 11 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.22% Terrible
Read 22.5
Write 10
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 8.8
16% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
80% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.22%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
37.5% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 14.9
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $397
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback