Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 08 '18 at 00:24
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 64.9
2-Core 123
56% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 372
36% 296 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (70 fps cap detected)
56.8% Above average
Lighting 69.7
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 66.5
57% 68.6 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 69.8
57% 69.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team L7 EVO SSD 120GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.8
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 461
Write 335
Mixed 295
80% 364 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 54.1
4K Mixed 11.2
80% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 17.4
45% 93.5 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 64%
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
22GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 115 51 44 50 51 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.5% Poor
Read 166
Write 100
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 74.3
23% 105 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 10.2
46% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 11.1
DQ Write 17.5
DQ Mixed 12.2
10% 13.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 85%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
221GB free
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 115 51 44 50 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 316
Write 352
Mixed 284
SusWrite 74.3
58% 257 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 30.5
110% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 35.1
DQ Write 71.6
DQ Mixed 38.2
33% 48.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
187GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 98 99 99 97 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 148
Write 143
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 96.6
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 107%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
925GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 147 146 150 150 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 147
Write 148
Mixed 96.5
SusWrite 145
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-058.A00LF F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-1600C11-8GIS F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 28GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.3% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 14.9
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.1
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback