Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateSep 10 '18 at 15:45
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 77.4
1-Core 49.5
2-Core 117
50% 81.3 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 333
34% 273 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Asus(1043 841E) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18% Very poor
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 10.8
20% 16 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 32.8
Splatting 13.7
15% 19.1 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 18%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 338 344 226 224 228 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 266
Write 328
Mixed 282
SusWrite 280
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 22.8
78% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 233
176% 236 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 99%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
257GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 135 136 136 136 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
66% Good
Read 92.7
Write 141
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 136
72% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.1
380% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66%
Great: 110%
Seagate ST9160314AS 160GB
94GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 36 35 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 56.2
Write 52.7
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 35.1
33% 44.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 36%
Kingston DT microDuo 3.0 32GB
14GB free, PID 16a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.6 11 10 12 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
6.37% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 22.2
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 10.6
19% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.37%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.3% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $516
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback