Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '18 at 19:20
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 138
2-Core 220
87% 151 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 812
78% 645 Pts
64-Core 1,101
68% 1,101 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.4.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 66.7
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 82.1
54% 72.5 fps
MRender 71.6
Gravity 64.3
Splatting 58.3
52% 64.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1400 1128 1165 1190 1178 1179 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 1,788
Write 1750
Mixed 881
SusWrite 1,207
315% 1,406 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 59
205% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,042
DQ Write 932
DQ Mixed 898
698% 957 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 252%
Great: 302%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
233GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 276 276 277 276 275 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 459
Mixed 406
SusWrite 297
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 56.4
200% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 226
207% 317 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 116%
Great: 118%
OCZ VERTEX2 60GB
56GB free
Firmware: 1.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 61 59 63 62 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 159
Write 78.3
Mixed 102
SusWrite 61.8
22% 100 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 30.8
112% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 73.9
DQ Mixed 87.3
67% 92.4 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 51%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
334GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.3 0.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1.3
Write 1
SusWrite 0.4
1% 0.9 MB/s
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 63%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 4GB
2GB free, PID 1643
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.01% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 18
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 3.4
14% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.01%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.5% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 21.9
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 23.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $979
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback