PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock AB350M (all builds) |
Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170717 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Sep 12 '18 at 22:09 |
Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 27% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
63.4%
Good
|
69% 124 Pts
|
46% 343 Pts
|
22% 347 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
15.8%
Very poor
|
0% 47 fps
|
46% 57.3 fps
|
|
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 105 110 86 93 94 MB/s
|
71.1%
Very good
|
74% 102 MB/s
|
153% 1.17 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown CT4G4DFS824A.C8FDD2 CT4G4DFS824A.C8FADP 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
74%
Very good
|
77% 27 GB/s
|
62% 21.7 GB/s
|
37% 107 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 77x |
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 49x |
Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples | 40x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 55x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 47x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 43x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 102% - Outstanding | Total price: $300 |