Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '18 at 19:26
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User MKD-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 76.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 226
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 888
80% 671 Pts
64-Core 1,220
76% 1,220 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Lighting 46.6
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 37.3
38% 38.4 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 35.9
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 999GB
831GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 62 61 50 70 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 429
Write 224
Mixed 206
SusWrite 61.6
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 4.1
16% 7.17 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 178
155% 234 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 411%
Amd-raid WDC WD10EZEX-22M 1TB
720GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.5 10 9.8 9.1 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
5.25% Terrible
Read 8.7
Write 10
Mixed 9
SusWrite 9.6
7% 9.33 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 5.25%
Great: 153%
Amd-raid ST3000DM001-1CH1 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 41 41 39 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 76.8
Write 58
Mixed 38
SusWrite 41.3
39% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 108%
Amd-raid WDC WD40EFRX-68N 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 48 46 46 44 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 68.7
Write 81
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 46.6
45% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 30.7
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 27
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $608
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback