Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive99.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '17 at 10:29
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.35 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 77.4
2-Core 121
60% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 478
45% 376 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 400
Mixed 417
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 32.1
145% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 125
123% 199 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 135%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 107%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$194
471GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 98%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
436GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69% Good
Read 129
Write 111
Mixed 102
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.15
70% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69%
Great: 68%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$194
418GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 160
Mixed 200
134% 177 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 3.24
4K Mixed 0.24
113% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 98%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 32GB
26GB free, PID 00d2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.34% Terrible
Read 31.1
Write 9.82
Mixed 11.7
18% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.63
4K Write 0.27
4K Mixed 0.31
33% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.34%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.3% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback