Asrock X300M-STX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive332% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X300M-STX  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '21 at 08:28
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 80.4
1-Core 152
2-Core 300
95% 178 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 942
95% 770 Pts
64-Core 1,108
69% 1,108 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 96%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 21
Parallax 29.5
18% 24.1 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 21.6
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR324 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2048 2131 2156 1264 2144 1447 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 2562
Write 2035
Mixed 1,517
SusWrite 1,865
447% 1,995 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 68.7
225% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 880
DQ Write 1,168
DQ Mixed 1,123
820% 1,057 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 332%
Great: 332%
3 2TB SSD 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: T0731A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 432 433 436 436 436 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 433
Mixed 384
SusWrite 433
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 31.7
145% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 49
74% 135 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 105%
Toshiba MK6465GSX 640GB
79GB free
Firmware: GJ002J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 68 67 68 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 62.6
Write 66.7
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 66.7
39% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 48%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08WN4A0 1TB
931GB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 181 183 182 183 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 176
Write 176
Mixed 95.1
SusWrite 182
211% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
137% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 34.1
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 26
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X300M-STX Builds (Compare 468 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock X300M-STX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback