HP Laptop 15-bs0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-bs0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8328
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180502
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '21 at 02:19
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
38.8% Below average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 48.7
2-Core 79.1
41% 64 Pts
4-Core 75.6
8-Core 120
12% 97.6 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8328) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.34% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 5.2
4% 4.8 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 8.1
6% 6.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.34%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
697GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 336 353 333 356 357 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 347
Write 361
Mixed 314
SusWrite 336
77% 339 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 29.5
98% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 196
164% 234 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 102%
Generic- SD/MMC/MS PRO 32GB
15GB free, PID 0177
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 26 26 26 27 27 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 26.4
Write 24.8
Mixed 18
SusWrite 24.7
32% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 3.1
174% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.6% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 15.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-bs0xx Builds (Compare 3,744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-bs0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback