Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Asus Z10PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170310
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '17 at 12:25
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 987 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Memory 55.3 1-Core 93.6 2-Core 202 62% 117 Pts	4-Core 365 8-Core 627 60% 496 Pts	64-Core 1,819 113% 1,819 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Lighting 41.6 Reflection 40.3 Parallax 37.3 34% 39.7 fps	MRender 50.3 Gravity 36.6 Splatting 39.2 34% 42.1 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB 2,100 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 209GB free Firmware: 8B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9676 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 826 (B1) Unknown 99 99 12 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 54 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 28 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5378076825	60.7% Good	Read 502 Write 245 Mixed 232 72% 326 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 58.4 4K Mixed 8.21 80% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 99.9 DQ Write 38.9 DQ Mixed 24 30% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 102%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6026 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 493 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 54 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 20 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7221004297	79.8% Very good	Read 510 Write 399 Mixed 412 98% 440 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 22.3 105% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 31.2 DQ Mixed 25.9 35% 66.2 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Series 500GB 7,390 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 101GB free Firmware: CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8272 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 551 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 57 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 494 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6072885128	86.9% Excellent	Read 508 Write 489 Mixed 512 112% 503 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 56.3 4K Mixed 19.7 107% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 32.9 DQ Mixed 27 43% 87.7 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 89%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 1,232 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4TB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 159 Write 112 Mixed 50.7 122% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.24 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 0.62 264% 2.96 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GB 970 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	63.2% Good	MC Read 28.8 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 20.2 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 16.3 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 142 28% 142 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 282 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 102%

UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	36x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	22x
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	19x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GBIntel $550Bench 186%, 8,641 samples	11x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	10x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	21x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 8x8GBMicronBench 92%, 150 samples	12x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $643

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16