Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170825
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '17 at 01:57
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Memory 84.5 1-Core 108 2-Core 227 78% 140 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 769 71% 594 Pts	64-Core 1,184 73% 1,184 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6698) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 382.5 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 145 Reflection 192 Parallax 202 118% 179 fps	Gravity 186 Splatting 131 137% 159 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200 7,034 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: R201 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 104 9288978 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 60 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -113455856054478 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 887 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 246 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 26 40 51542229018 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 9288978 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 60 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 9288978 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 9288978 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 33361 (EA) Unknown 0 0 19291 (F1) Unknown 0 0 19291 (F2) Unknown 0 0 26683	74.7% Very good	Read 490 Write 217 Mixed 248 70% 318 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 74.2 4K Mixed 20.3 112% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 58.2 82% 155 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 91%
WD WD8000AARS-00Y5B1 800GB 1,154 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 293GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 132 116 6391 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 587 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 21231 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 541 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 130 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 42 42 474686 (C2) HDA temperature 117 104 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 4 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 3 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 4	38.9% Below average	Read 69.3 Write 66 Mixed 67.4 51% 67.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.18 70% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 57%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 275GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 180 169 3966 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4530 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 35 35 47575 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1747 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 459 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4070 (C2) HDA temperature 114 98 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 8 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	65.8% Good	Read 135 Write 94.6 Mixed 101 83% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 0.25 4K Mixed 0.16 53% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 76%
TOSHIBA silicon-power 16GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 15GB free, PID 1400 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	8.04% Terrible	Read 18 Write 10.1 Mixed 12.3 16% 13.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.73 4K Write 0.46 4K Mixed 0.31 55% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.04% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB 20,017 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	MC Read 45.1 MC Write 42 MC Mixed 34.5 116% 40.5 GB/s	SC Read 25.9 SC Write 38.5 SC Mixed 30.6 90% 31.7 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	87x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,046

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16