Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory49.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210423
Uptime8 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '22 at 10:36
Run Duration385 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 75
1-Core 121
2-Core 236
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 656
64% 526 Pts
64-Core 808
50% 808 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59% Above average
Lighting 71.6
Reflection 90.7
Parallax 77.4
58% 79.9 fps
MRender 77
Gravity 74.9
Splatting 70.3
60% 74.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59%
Great: 66%
AMD FirePro W600
AMD(1002 2B1E) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.Q2
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
6.44% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 12.3
6% 11.3 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 9.5
8% 9.47 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.44%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 766GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 53 66 78 96 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 874
Write 1,440
Mixed 441
SusWrite 87.3
159% 711 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 22.9
66% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 406
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 190
166% 253 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74%
Great: 303%
Adata SE800 1TB
805GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 549 236 223 400 383 493 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 472
Write 183
Mixed 425
SusWrite 381
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 16
55% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 148
104% 130 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 84%
Amd-raid SPCC M.2 PCIe SS 256GB
232GB free
Firmware: VB41 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 707 711 704 696 735 211 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,437
Write 784
Mixed 895
SusWrite 627
208% 936 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 33.2
113% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 225
160% 202 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 139%
Great: 160%
Amd-raid WDC WD20EARX-00P 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 69 75 60 65 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 126
Write 116
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 68.2
69% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 89%
Seagate Expansion Desk 10TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 225 227 225 227 224 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 107%
Seagate Expansion Desk 10TB
704GB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 166 168 167 167 167 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 107%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
9TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 202 213 200 208 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 205
Mixed 163
SusWrite 205
264% 195 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 2.3
434% 6.83 MB/s
DQ Read 2.8
DQ Write 9.3
DQ Mixed 1.8
388% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 106%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M1A2400C16 CMV32GX4M1A2400C16 63GB
2400, 2400 MHz
32767, 32767 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.7% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 27.4
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 24.2
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,098 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,087
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback