Asus PRIME X370-A

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-A (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170620
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '17 at 20:14
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 69 1-Core 110 2-Core 216 72% 132 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 592 55% 461 Pts	64-Core 1,080 67% 1,080 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Lighting 142 Reflection 150 Parallax 129 116% 140 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 130 Splatting 108 95% 117 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	188% Outstanding	Read 1,991 Write 1,165 Mixed 1,135 315% 1,430 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 65.5 4K Mixed 18.5 121% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 41.2 DQ Write 65.3 DQ Mixed 18.4 24% 41.7 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 188% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 65GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 16510 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 73 (B1) Unknown 98 98 39 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 60 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 29 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11066821488	88.8% Excellent	Read 509 Write 410 Mixed 420 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 55.2 4K Mixed 33.7 124% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 53 57% 96.1 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 98 65818520 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 3031 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 54 51 42952475941 (09) Power-on hours count 53 53 41478 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 103 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 102 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 65 13406765087 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 64 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 71 71 58677 (C2) HDA temperature 31 40 -140737488355297 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 32 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 32 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 27200027914801 (F1) Unknown 100 253 10743420016 (F2) Unknown 100 253 31899528808	90.3% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 153 Mixed 159 119% 158 MB/s	4K Read 1.01 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.3 96% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 113%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB-$124 3,178 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: MEAOA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 105 (03) Spinup time 143 143 34394735035 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2596 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 132 132 32 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 51431 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 152 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3322 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3322 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 176094183457 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	52% Above average	Read 103 Write 78 Mixed 75.3 64% 85.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.31 85% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 924GB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 78 65 60188389 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 463 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 9397691 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 62667867821572 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 53 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 64 488243229 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 374 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6035 (C2) HDA temperature 29 40 68719476765 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 8096013356852 (F1) Unknown 100 253 5893989260 (F2) Unknown 100 253 349973410	62.9% Good	Read 113 Write 106 Mixed 111 83% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.27 85% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 704GB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 83 64 216606327 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 417 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 61 17382343 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 -48820893247999 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 53 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 63 488243229 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 337 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6342 (C2) HDA temperature 29 40 68719476765 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -74689481273433 (F1) Unknown 100 253 6369016745 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3760634696	87.8% Excellent	Read 166 Write 140 Mixed 126 108% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.24 88% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.3% Very good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 26.6 82% 28.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 28.4 SC Mixed 22 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-A Builds (Compare 440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-A

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	57x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	48x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	44x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	34x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	34x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	21x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	13x
HyperX 2666 C16 2x16GBKingstonBench 84%, 17,710 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $692

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16